Patient exposure in the basic science classroom enhances differential diagnosis formation and clinical decision-making

Department of Graduate Medical Education, San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium, San Antonio, TX, USA
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA
DOI
10.7287/peerj.preprints.744v1
Subject Areas
Pathology, Science and Medical Education
Keywords
differential diagnosis, clinical decision-making, patient exposure, undergraduate medical education, pre-clinical, pathology, basic science, history-taking, empathy, clinical skills
Copyright
© 2014 Peacock et al.
Licence
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ PrePrints) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
Cite this article
Peacock JG, Grande JP. 2014. Patient exposure in the basic science classroom enhances differential diagnosis formation and clinical decision-making. PeerJ PrePrints 2:e744v1

Abstract

Purpose: The authors proposed that introducing real patients into a pathology classroom early in medical education would help integrate fundamental principles and disease pathology with clinical presentation and medical history. Methods: Three patients with different pathologies described their history and presentation without revealing their diagnosis. Students were required to submit a differential diagnosis in writing, and then they were able to ask questions to arrive at the correct diagnosis. Students were surveyed on the efficacy of patient-based learning. Results: Average student scores on the differential diagnosis assignments significantly improved 32% during the course. From the survey, 72% of students felt that patient encounters should be included in the pathology course next year. 74% felt that the differential diagnosis assignments helped them develop clinical decision-making skills. 73% felt that the experience helped them know what questions to ask patients. 86% felt that they obtained a better understanding of patients’ social and emotional challenges. Discussion: Having students work through the process of differential diagnosis formulation when encountering a real patient and their clinical presentation improved clinical decision-making skills and integrated fundamental concepts with disease pathology during a basic science pathology course. o

Author Comment

The manuscript will be submitted to PeerJ for review.