Your institution has a plan with PeerJ, so that you don't have to pay to publish Open Access. See if you qualify

Read for yourself

why authors & institutions are choosing to publish in PeerJ.
Author interviews / Institutional case studies
PrePrint: Prolactin and fMRI response to SKF38393 in the baboon
  Visitors   Views   Downloads
 
 
Visitors
 
Views
 
Downloads
View all metrics + mentions on the Web
PREPRINT - PeerJ PrePrints is not a peer-reviewed venue.
Note that a peer-reviewed article of this PrePrint also exists.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

Dr. Black is an Academic Editor for PeerJ.

Author Contributions

Brad D. Miller conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper.

Lauren A. Marks analyzed the data, reviewed and edited the manuscript.

Jonathan Koller analyzed the data, reviewed and edited the manuscript.

Blake J. Newman analyzed the data, reviewed and edited the manuscript.

G. Larry Bretthorst contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed and edited the manuscript.

Kevin J Black conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Washington University Animal Studies Committee, protocol # 20090112.

Grant Disclosures

The following grant information was disclosed by the authors:

U.S. National Institutes of Health (1R21MH081080, 3R21MH081080-01A1S1, K24MH087913, T35HL007815)

Funding

1. U.S. National Institutes of Health (1R21MH081080 and ARRA supplement 3R21MH081080-01A1S1; K24 MH087913; T35 HL007815) 2. McDonnell Center for Systems Neuroscience at Washington University 3. Boehringer-Ingelheim graciously provided the pramipexole. Boehringer-Ingelheim required that we administer no single dose higher than 0.2mg/kg i.v., but otherwise did not affect the study design, data collection, or analysis, or the writing of the manuscript.

Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)