Experimental food supplementation increases reproductive effort in an antbird in subtropical Brazilian Atlantic Forest fragments

Ecologia de Ecossistemas, Universidade Vila Velha, Vila Velha, Espírito Santo, Brazil
Programa de Pós Graduação em Ecologia e Conservação, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
Centro Acadêmico de Vitória, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Vitória de Santo Antão, Pernambuco, Brazil
DOI
10.7287/peerj.preprints.705v1
Subject Areas
Animal Behavior, Ecology
Keywords
breeding season length, renesting intervals, nest predation, forest fragments, Experimental food supplementation, Variable Antshrike
Copyright
© 2014 Roper et al.
Licence
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ PrePrints) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
Cite this article
Roper JJ, Lima AMX, Uejima AMK. 2014. Experimental food supplementation increases reproductive effort in an antbird in subtropical Brazilian Atlantic Forest fragments. PeerJ PrePrints 2:e705v1

Abstract

Food limitation may interact with nest predation and influence nesting patterns, such as breeding season length and renesting intervals. If so, reproductive effort should change with food availability. Thus, when food is limited, birds should have fewer attempts and shorter seasons than when food is not limiting. Here we experimentally test that increased food availability results in increased reproductive effort in a fragmented landscape in the Variable Antshrike (Thamnophilus caerulescens) in southern Brazil. We followed nesting pairs in five natural fragments (4, 23, 24, 112, 214 ha) in which food was supplemented for half of those pairs, beginning with the first nest. Nest success in the largest (214 ha) fragment was 59%, compared to 5% in the 112 ha fragment and no nest was successful in the smallest (24 ha) fragment. Birds were seen, but evidence of nesting was never found in the two smallest fragments. Pairs with supplemented food were more likely to increase clutch size from two to three eggs, tended to renest sooner (20 d on average) than control pairs. Also, fragment size interacted with breeding and pairs in the largest fragment had greater daily nest survival rates, and so nests tended to last longer, and so these pairs had fewer nesting attempts than those in the 112 ha fragment while more than those in the smallest fragment with nesting (24 ha). Clearly, pairs increased their reproductive effort when food was supplemented in comparison to control pairs and fragment size seems to influence both predation risk and food abundance.

Author Comment

This manuscript has evolved a bit, originally from emphasizing fragmentation, and now emphasizes the food supplementation experiment. We plan to submit to PeerJ.