Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

A newer version of this Preprint is available: View the latest version

Supplemental Information

Data to reproduce statistical analysis

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.703v1/supp-2

R script to reproduce statistical analysis (save as .R file)

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.703v1/supp-3

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Kirsten Jackson conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Lukas M. Weber analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Marc Tennant conceived and designed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

The study was a clinical improvement retrospective record audit and the guidelines of the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) were followed.

Funding

The authors declare there was no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies