Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Appendices A-D, tables and Appendix E caption

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.653v2/supp-1

Appendix E. Map of combinations of guild assemblages across the Columbia and Missouri River basins

Appendix E. Map of combinations of guild assemblages across the Columbia and Missouri River basins showed that a majority of reaches contained all possible guilds. Only a few reaches were absent of all woody guilds. Map labels consist of guild initials and “P” for guild presence and “A” for guild absence. For example, UDP corresponds to upland disturbance present while ETA corresponds to evergreen tree absent, etc.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.653v2/supp-2

Additional Information

Competing Interests

David M. Merritt and Brett B. Roper are employees of the USDA Forest Service, and A. Lexine Long is an employee of the United States Geological Survey.

Author Contributions

Nate Hough-Snee conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Brian Laub conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

David M. Merritt conceived and designed the experiments, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper, conceptual models and research framework development.

A. Lexine Long conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Lloyd L. Nackley conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Brett B. Roper conceived and designed the experiments, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Joseph M Wheaton conceived and designed the experiments, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of related data:

This data will be published alongside the final version of the article at the accepting journal. In the case of Ecosphere, this would mean Ecological Archives.

Funding

USFS Regions one, four and six and BLM state field offices funded data collection and management through the PACFISH/INFISH Biological Opinion EMP. NH-S was supported in part by a Presidential Fellowship from Utah State University and STAR Fellowship Assistance Agreement no. 91768201 – 0 awarded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies