Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Supplemental Data File 1: Spreadsheet listing well-supported, alternative splicing events with 20% or greater splicing difference between pollen and leaves

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.594v2/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

April D Estrada conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Nowlan H Freese analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Ivory C Blakley analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Ann E Loraine conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of related data:

http://www.bitbucket.org/lorainelab/pollenas

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation Research Coordination Network for Integrative Pollen Biology (grant no. MCB-0955431) and National Science Foundation Arabidopsis 2010 (grant no. 0820371). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies