Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Information and Consent form for participants, parent/guardian version

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.593v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Nicholas A Badcock conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Kathryn A Preece performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper, managed recruitment, scheduling, and personnel.

Bianca de Wit performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Katharine Glenn performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Nora Fieder performed the experiments, analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Johnson Thie contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Genevieve McArthur conceived and designed the experiments, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Human Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

The Macquarie University Human Research Ethics Committee approved the methods used in this study (approval number: 5201200658).

Funding

This research was supported by an ARC Centre of Excellence Grant [CE110001021] and an NHMRC equipment grant. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies