Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Computer code for calculation of a Bayesian model to estimate confidence intervals for u2

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.582v1/supp-1

Raw data used in the present paper

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.582v1/supp-2

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Jacques Derek D Charlwood conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Nep Phala performed the experiments.

Siv Sovannaroth reviewed drafts of the paper.

John Morgan reviewed drafts of the paper.

Janet Hemingway reviewed drafts of the paper.

Nakul Chitnis analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper, developed the model used in the paper.

Olivier JT Briët analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper, developed the model used in the paper.

Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

The ethical committees of the National Centre of Malariology (CNM) in Phnom Penh, (Cambodia) and of the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (UK) approved the study. The mosquito collectors and householders were informed about the objectives, processes and procedures of the study and oral informed consent was sought from them. Collectors were recruited among the adult village population on the understanding that if they wanted to withdraw from the study they could do so at any time without prejudice. Access to malaria diagnosis and treatment was guaranteed throughout the study.

Funding

This study was funded by DIFD. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies