Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Appendices and supplementary figures and tables

Supplementary Information

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.573v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Kathrin E Peyer conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Mark Morris conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.

William I Sellers conceived and designed the experiments, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Human Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

The experimental protocol (reference number 13310) was approved by the University of Manchester ethics panel.

Funding

Research was funded by the the BBSRC (grant number BB/K006029/1). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies