Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Table S1 Microarray of 84 ubiquitylation pathway genes in mouse skeletal muscles treated by ART

Fold changes were calculated from the comparison of ART with AL.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.565v1/supp-1

Table S2 Microarray of 84 ubiquitylation pathway genes in mouse skeletal muscles treated by SNP

Fold changes were calculated from the comparison of SNP with AL.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.565v1/supp-2

Table S3 Microarray of 84 ubiquitylation pathway genes in mouse skeletal muscles treated by ARG

Fold changes were calculated from the comparison of ARG with AL.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.565v1/supp-3

Table S4 Microarray of 84 ubiquitylation pathway genes in mouse skeletal muscles treated by H2O2

Fold changes were calculated from the comparison of H2O2 with AL.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.565v1/supp-4

Table S5 Microarray of 84 ubiquitylation pathway genes in mouse skeletal muscles treated by CR

Fold changes were calculated from the comparison of CR with AL.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.565v1/supp-5

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Da-Ting Wang performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Ming Wu performed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Si-ming Li performed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Qian Gao performed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Qing-Ping Zeng conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

All animal procedures were in accordance with the animal care committee at the Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China. The protocol was approved by the Animal Care Welfare Committee of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Permit Number: SPF-2011007).

Funding

Financial support was provided by the National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) with the grant No. 81273620. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies