Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

SPM of SYN effect using ASL

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.493v1/supp-1

SPM of SYN effect using BOLD

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.493v1/supp-2

SPM of 2 back effect using ASL

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.493v1/supp-3

SPM of 2 back effect using BOLD

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.493v1/supp-4

SPM of SYN x 2back effect using ASL

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.493v1/supp-5

SPM of SYN x 2 back effect using BOLD

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.493v1/supp-6

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The original study was funded commercially, but the sponsor did not participate in or affect this analysis or this report. There have been no other commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. Kevin Black is an academic editor for PeerJ.

Author Contributions

Stephanie Stewart analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Jonathan Koller performed the experiments, analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Meghan Campbell performed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Kevin Black conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Human Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Washington University’s Human Research Protection Office, approval # 08-0059

Funding

The analysis reported here was supported by NIH (K24 MH087913 and T32 DA007261). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies