Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Rabbit localities sampled in this work

Supplementary Table 1. Rabbit localities sampled in this work, number of individuals analyzed, geographical coordinates and subspecies occurring in each locality according to it its natural distribution range. Numbers correspond to those indicated in Fig. 1.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.479v1/supp-1

Genetic diversity statistics for all the rabbit localities analyzed

Supplementary Table 2. Genetic diversity statistics for all the rabbit localities analyzed. N = number of samples, NA = number of alleles, Ho = observed heterozygosity, He = expected heteroygosity, FIS = inbreeding coefficient.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.479v1/supp-2

Genetic diversity statistics for the rabbit populations inferred in BAPS

Supplementary Table 3. Genetic diversity statistics for the rabbit populations inferred in BAPS. N = number of samples, NA = number of alleles, Ho = observed heterozygosity, He = expected heteroygosity, FIS = inbreeding coefficient.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.479v1/supp-3

Rabbit microsatellite data set, Alda & Doadrio

Full data set of 10 microsatellite genotypes, including locality, coordinates, and mitochondrial haplotype for each individual analyzed in this study.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.479v1/supp-4

Additional Information

Competing Interests

Fernando Alda was a predoctoral fellow and Ignacio Doadrio is an employee of the Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales.

Author Contributions

Fernando Alda conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Ignacio Doadrio conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

The study presented did not involve any experiments with live animals. All the animals used in this study were not captured for scientific purposes, but for management and restocking activities carried out by local administrations, or represented animals killed by hunters during legal hunting season in Spain. Therefore, no approval was requested from the Ethics Committee at the Spanish Superior Research Council (CSIC).

Funding

F. Alda benefited from a FPU pre-doctoral grant from the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science. Funding was provided by projects MAM/2484/2002-65/2002 and 010203030003 granted to I. Doadrio and R. Zardoya. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies