Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Raw data (larval weight and survival)

Monitoring of larval weight and larval mortality, for two population of Costelytra zealandica (populations A and B) and one population of C. brunneum (population C), over a period of six weeks, under three different temperature regimes (10, 15 and 20 degrees).

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.460v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The following authors are employees of the Bio-Protection Research Centre: Marie-Caroline Lefort, Samuel Brown, Stéphane Boyer, Susan Worner and Karen F. Armstrong. The following author is an employee of the Department of Agriculture and Life Sciences of Lincoln University: Stéphane Boyer

Author Contributions

Marie-Caroline Lefort conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Samuel D. J. Brown performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables.

Stéphane Boyer reviewed drafts of the paper.

Susan SP Worner reviewed drafts of the paper.

Karen Armstrong reviewed drafts of the paper.

Funding

Financial support was provided by the Miss E. L. Hellaby Indigenous Grasslands Research Trust, Better Border Biosecurity and the Bio-Protection Research Centre. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies