Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Teaching methods

Fig. S1 - Teaching methods and learning outcomes (taught and non-taught) of the CM-RD course

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.456v1/supp-1

Assessment

Fig S2 - Questions in written examination, learning outcomes (assessed and non-assessed) and main outcomes of the CM-RD course

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.456v1/supp-2

Constructive alignment

Fig S3 -Constructive alignment and gap analysis of the CM-RD course

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.456v1/supp-3

Appendix S4

Appendix S4 - Description of the sixteen learning outcomes and main outcome categories they belong

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.456v1/supp-4

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests

Author Contributions

Christos Vaitsis conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables.

Gunnar Nilsson analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Nabil Zary conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Funding

The study was funded with intramural funds from Karolinska Institutet. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies