Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Graham R Wood conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables.

Nigel Burroughs conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

David J Evans conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Eugene V Ryabov conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

EBI SRA study accession PRJEB5249, ERS395182 EBI SRA study accession PRJEB5249, ERS395180

NCBI Accession Nos. HM067437 and HM067438

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of related data:

EBI SRA study accession PRJEB5249, ERS395182 EBI SRA study accession PRJEB5249, ERS395180

NCBI Accession Nos. HM067437 and HM067438

Funding

This work was supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, the Natural Environment Research Council, the Scottish Government and the Wellcome Trust, under the Insect Pollinators Initiative [grant number BBI0008281]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies