Visitors   Views   Downloads
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Supplemental information S1: Simulations to demonstrate feasibility and and sensitivity

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.413v2/supp-1

Supplemental information S2: Investigating model sensitivities

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.413v2/supp-2

Supplemental information S3: Selecting fatty acids using constrained ordination

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.413v2/supp-3

Supplemental information S4: Discrimination and conversion coefficients for the Squid example

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.413v2/supp-4

Supplemental information S5: Analysing Squid diets from fatty acids and stable isotopes

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.413v2/supp-5

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests. Philipp Neubauer is an employee of Dragonfly Science.

Author Contributions

Philipp Neubauer conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper, wrote R package.

Olaf P Jensen conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Grant Disclosures

The following grant information was disclosed by the authors:

Award No. EA133F1 from the Garden State Seafood Association

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of related data:

Neubauer, Philipp (2014): Squid fatty acids and Stable Isotope data. figshare.


This research was funded under award EA133F1 Garden State Seafood Association to Olaf P. Jensen. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies