Visitors   Views   Downloads

Assessing the quality of Astragalus fermented using Lactobacillus plantarum and Enterococcus faecium by its physicochemical properties and monitoring the bacterial composition with single molecule, real-time sequencing technology

View preprint
336 days ago
Assessing the quality of Astragalus fermented using Lactobacillus plantarum and Enterococcus faecium by its physicochemical properties and monitoring the bacterial composition with single molecule, real-time sequencing technology https://t.co/fEPeauniXn
Assessing the quality of Astragalus fermented using Lactobacillus plantarum and Enterococcus faecium by its physicochemical properties and monitoring the bacterial composition with single molecule, real-time sequencing technology https://t.co/P5jFNlPCBH
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Raw data Figure-1-2-3

Raw data Figure-1-2-3

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3512v1/supp-10

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Hongxing Qiao conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables.

Xiaojing Zhang performed the experiments.

Hongtao Shi analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools.

Yuzhen Song performed the experiments.

Chuanzhou Bian conceived and designed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw sequence reads have been deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information Short Read Archive under the accession number SAMN07411593-SAMN07411601.

Funding

This work was supported by the Henan Province Natural Science Planning Fund Projects [grant NO. 162300410128] and by the veterinary discipline key construction project of Henan University of Animal Husbandry and Economy [grant NO.MXK2016102]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies