Visitors   Views   Downloads

Disentangling the mechanisms of mate choice in a captive koala population

View preprint
RT @KathyBelov: Want to know more about mate choice in #koalas - check out our preprint in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/ZWT0WsXtxB #AnimalB…
RT @KathyBelov: Want to know more about mate choice in #koalas - check out our preprint in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/ZWT0WsXtxB #AnimalB…
RT @KathyBelov: Want to know more about mate choice in #koalas - check out our preprint in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/ZWT0WsXtxB #AnimalB…
RT @KathyBelov: Want to know more about mate choice in #koalas - check out our preprint in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/ZWT0WsXtxB #AnimalB…
Want to know more about mate choice in #koalas - check out our preprint in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/ZWT0WsXtxB #AnimalBehavior #ConservationBiology. First paper for honours student @PariceBrandies
114 days ago
Disentangling the mechanisms of mate choice in a captive koala population https://t.co/L4vxvfzuAF
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Parice A Brandies performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables.

Catherine E Grueber conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Jamie A Ivy contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Carolyn J Hogg conceived and designed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Professor K Belov conceived and designed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Samples were collected under San Diego Zoo Global IACUC protocols 10-008, 10-009, 11-029, 14-034.

Funding

Funding for this project was provided by the ARC (DP150101485). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies