Visitors   Views   Downloads

Fallibility in science: Responding to errors in the work of oneself and others

View preprint
RT @deevybee: Reviewers of my 'fallibility paper' (https://t.co/sZOogjLcp2) prompt me to try my 1st twitter poll. This is for researchers w…
RT @deevybee: Reviewers of my 'fallibility paper' (https://t.co/sZOogjLcp2) prompt me to try my 1st twitter poll. This is for researchers w…
RT @deevybee: Reviewers of my 'fallibility paper' (https://t.co/sZOogjLcp2) prompt me to try my 1st twitter poll. This is for researchers w…
234 days ago
RT @deevybee: Reviewers of my 'fallibility paper' (https://t.co/sZOogjLcp2) prompt me to try my 1st twitter poll. This is for researchers w…
RT @deevybee: Reviewers of my 'fallibility paper' (https://t.co/sZOogjLcp2) prompt me to try my 1st twitter poll. This is for researchers w…
RT @deevybee: Reviewers of my 'fallibility paper' (https://t.co/sZOogjLcp2) prompt me to try my 1st twitter poll. This is for researchers w…
RT @deevybee: Reviewers of my 'fallibility paper' (https://t.co/sZOogjLcp2) prompt me to try my 1st twitter poll. This is for researchers w…
RT @deevybee: Reviewers of my 'fallibility paper' (https://t.co/sZOogjLcp2) prompt me to try my 1st twitter poll. This is for researchers w…
RT @deevybee: Reviewers of my 'fallibility paper' (https://t.co/sZOogjLcp2) prompt me to try my 1st twitter poll. This is for researchers w…
RT @deevybee: Reviewers of my 'fallibility paper' (https://t.co/sZOogjLcp2) prompt me to try my 1st twitter poll. This is for researchers w…
RT @deevybee: Reviewers of my 'fallibility paper' (https://t.co/sZOogjLcp2) prompt me to try my 1st twitter poll. This is for researchers w…
RT @deevybee: Reviewers of my 'fallibility paper' (https://t.co/sZOogjLcp2) prompt me to try my 1st twitter poll. This is for researchers w…
RT @deevybee: Reviewers of my 'fallibility paper' (https://t.co/sZOogjLcp2) prompt me to try my 1st twitter poll. This is for researchers w…
Reviewers of my 'fallibility paper' (https://t.co/sZOogjLcp2) prompt me to try my 1st twitter poll. This is for researchers who found a serious error after submitting a study (any takers?!)
RT @jvrbntz: “…open science practices… help avoid errors and also leads to recognition that mistakes are part of normal science. Indeed, a…
RT @deevybee: A good moment to retweet my thoughts on Fallibility in Science: https://t.co/sZOogjLcp2 https://t.co/4EeAurhFGK
RT @deevybee: A good moment to retweet my thoughts on Fallibility in Science: https://t.co/sZOogjLcp2 https://t.co/4EeAurhFGK
RT @deevybee: A good moment to retweet my thoughts on Fallibility in Science: https://t.co/sZOogjLcp2 https://t.co/4EeAurhFGK
RT @deevybee: A good moment to retweet my thoughts on Fallibility in Science: https://t.co/sZOogjLcp2 https://t.co/4EeAurhFGK
RT @deevybee: A good moment to retweet my thoughts on Fallibility in Science: https://t.co/sZOogjLcp2 https://t.co/4EeAurhFGK
A good moment to retweet my thoughts on Fallibility in Science: https://t.co/sZOogjLcp2 https://t.co/4EeAurhFGK
RT @deevybee: Wow. the hardworking elves at @thePeerJ posted this preprint far faster than I had thought possible! Comments welcomed before…
281 days ago
#PrePrint Aceptar los errores (propios o ajenos) en la práctica científica es importante para que progresemos. https://t.co/qo87SNiT8v
RT @Protohedgehog: "My key message is that for science to progress, we have to accept the inevitability of error." vi @deevybee @PeerJPrepr…
RT @Protohedgehog: "My key message is that for science to progress, we have to accept the inevitability of error." vi @deevybee @PeerJPrepr…
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The author declares that she has no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Dorothy V Bishop wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Paper is a commentary with no data or code.

Funding

The author is funded by a Principal Research Fellowship from the Wellcome Trust (082498/Z/07/Z). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies