Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

SNP table for the 16S gene

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3480v1/supp-1

Runtime comparison between DACCOR and Vmatch

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3480v1/supp-2

SNP tabel for the 23S gene

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3480v1/supp-3

Improvements on the reconstruction of the two syphilis genes

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3480v1/supp-4

Runtime of Daccor on the Nichols genome

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3480v1/supp-5

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Alexander Seitz conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, performed the computation work, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Friederike Hanssen wrote the paper, performed the computation work, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Kay Nieselt wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

https://github.com/Integrative-Transcriptomics/Daccor

Funding

We received support from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and the Open Access Publishing Fund of University of Tübingen. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies