NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

A newer version of this Preprint is available: View the latest version

Supplemental Information

Figure S1: Newly developed fusion primer sets (BF2+BR2), suitable for tagging 288 individual wells

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3456v4/supp-1

Figure S2: Base composition of the inline tagging region

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3456v4/supp-2

Figure S3: Hamming distance between tags for all fusion primers

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3456v4/supp-3

Figure S4: Levenshtein distance between tags for all fusion primers

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3456v4/supp-4

Script S1: R script used for randomly generating inline barcodes for the given primer sets (includes visualization, as shown in Figure S3 and Figure 3)

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3456v4/supp-5

Table S1: Table providing an overview of proposed tagging combinations (as shown in Figure 3)

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3456v4/supp-6

Manuscript file for providing feedback

(Pleas use track changes)

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3456v4/supp-7

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Vasco Elbrecht conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Dirk Steinke authored or reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

primer sequences and scripts to generated them are provided as supporting information

Funding

V.E. and D.S. are supported by funding through the Canada First Research Excellence Fund. This work represents a contribution to the ‘Food From Thought’ research program and the EU Action ‘DNAqua-Net’ (CA15219). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
5 Citations   Views   Downloads