"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Schoenemann & Bonier full dataset

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3432v1/supp-2

Supplemental Figure 1A

Supplemental Figure 1. Funnel plot of all glucocorticoid (GC) repeatability estimates and sample sizes for A) every study included in the meta-analysis and B) every study with a sample size less than 150. Repeatability of initial GCs are represented with open circles, response GCs with open triangles, and integrated GCs with closed squares. In this study, we defined initial measures as those representing GCs in circulation within a time period expected not to reflect the acute stress of capture, response for elevated GC titers following an acute capture stress, and integrated for GC titers that represent hormone secretion over a relatively long period of time (e.g., GC concentrations in feces, feathers, and saliva). No substantial asymmetry was found, suggesting the data are not strongly biased.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3432v1/supp-3

Supplemental Tables

Results from statistical analyses.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3432v1/supp-5

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Kelsey L Schoenemann conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper, compiled dataset.

Frances Bonier conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.


Funding from an NSERC Discovery Grant and Queen’s University supported KS’s graduate stipend. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads