Manipulating the alpha level cannot cure significance testing

221 days ago
Manipulating the alpha level cannot cure significance testing – comments on "Redefine statistical significance”: https://t.co/mP2fzX3iUZ
221 days ago
RT @kosugitti: 0.05を0.005とかそういう小手先の問題じゃねえんだ論文に名前を連ねました。 in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/v092vSl4kW #SciencePolicy #Statistics
221 days ago
RT @kosugitti: 0.05を0.005とかそういう小手先の問題じゃねえんだ論文に名前を連ねました。 in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/v092vSl4kW #SciencePolicy #Statistics
RT @kosugitti: 0.05を0.005とかそういう小手先の問題じゃねえんだ論文に名前を連ねました。 in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/v092vSl4kW #SciencePolicy #Statistics
Not curing significance testing https://t.co/Uj6B0l3uru
RT @kosugitti: 0.05を0.005とかそういう小手先の問題じゃねえんだ論文に名前を連ねました。 in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/v092vSl4kW #SciencePolicy #Statistics
221 days ago
RT @kosugitti: 0.05を0.005とかそういう小手先の問題じゃねえんだ論文に名前を連ねました。 in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/v092vSl4kW #SciencePolicy #Statistics
RT @kosugitti: 0.05を0.005とかそういう小手先の問題じゃねえんだ論文に名前を連ねました。 in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/v092vSl4kW #SciencePolicy #Statistics
221 days ago
RT @kosugitti: 0.05を0.005とかそういう小手先の問題じゃねえんだ論文に名前を連ねました。 in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/v092vSl4kW #SciencePolicy #Statistics
RT @PsyBrief: Another commentary on redefining significance https://t.co/mdahZXWBZv Inferences should be based on an accumulation of eviden…
221 days ago
RT @kosugitti: 0.05を0.005とかそういう小手先の問題じゃねえんだ論文に名前を連ねました。 in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/v092vSl4kW #SciencePolicy #Statistics
221 days ago
Manipulating the Alpha Level Cannot Cure Significance Testing https://t.co/Clxi24k7aP
221 days ago
RT @kosugitti: 0.05を0.005とかそういう小手先の問題じゃねえんだ論文に名前を連ねました。 in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/v092vSl4kW #SciencePolicy #Statistics
RT @kosugitti: 0.05を0.005とかそういう小手先の問題じゃねえんだ論文に名前を連ねました。 in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/v092vSl4kW #SciencePolicy #Statistics
RT @kosugitti: 0.05を0.005とかそういう小手先の問題じゃねえんだ論文に名前を連ねました。 in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/v092vSl4kW #SciencePolicy #Statistics
Changing the alpha level cannot cure significance testing – comments on "Redefine statistical significance" https://t.co/1raEBtx1QL. "To boil all this down to a binary decision based on a p-value threshold of .05, .01, .005, or anything else, is not acceptable."
Changing the alpha level cannot cure significance testing – new comments on "Redefine statistical significance" https://t.co/kc6RGyXI2H
221 days ago
RT @kosugitti: 0.05を0.005とかそういう小手先の問題じゃねえんだ論文に名前を連ねました。 in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/v092vSl4kW #SciencePolicy #Statistics
RT @PsyBrief: Another commentary on redefining significance https://t.co/mdahZXWBZv Inferences should be based on an accumulation of eviden…
221 days ago
RT @kosugitti: 0.05を0.005とかそういう小手先の問題じゃねえんだ論文に名前を連ねました。 in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/v092vSl4kW #SciencePolicy #Statistics
RT @timetit: Manipulating the alpha level cannot cure significance testing https://t.co/2J4TqfQnD1 To boil all this down to a binary decisi…
Manipulating the alpha level cannot cure significance testing https://t.co/2J4TqfQnD1 To boil all this down to a binary decision based on a p-value threshold of .05, .01, .005, or anything else, is not acceptable @massimo006 aggiungi Marco Tullio Liuzza e Rosaria Lombardo
RT @PsyBrief: Another commentary on redefining significance https://t.co/mdahZXWBZv Inferences should be based on an accumulation of eviden…
RT @PsyBrief: Another commentary on redefining significance https://t.co/mdahZXWBZv Inferences should be based on an accumulation of eviden…
Manipulating the alpha level cannot cure significance testing – comments on "Redefine statistical significance" https://t.co/OvUFb18TCB