Visitors   Views   Downloads

Manipulating the alpha level cannot cure significance testing – comments on "Redefine statistical significance"

View preprint
'Manipulating the alpha level cannot cure significance testing – comments on "Redefine statistical significance"' was one of the top 5 most viewed #SciencePolicy and #Statistics articles published in @thePeerJ journal in 2017! https://t.co/hFZcXrejIe
RT @OmnesResNetwork: Don't forget to read https://t.co/pttKAFWMDk, or https://t.co/ezdMXOAToY, or https://t.co/Zi3ntuWvdK https://t.co/OOVD…
Don't forget to read https://t.co/pttKAFWMDk, or https://t.co/ezdMXOAToY, or https://t.co/Zi3ntuWvdK https://t.co/OOVDUynZqn
RT @FamedCelebrity: Manipulating the alpha level cannot cure significance testing – comments on "Redefine statistical significance" https:/…
Manipulating the alpha level cannot cure significance testing – comments on "Redefine statistical significance" https://t.co/UTrFoU8R9r in Top 2017 Preprints! https://t.co/oNM8nCOUj8
Not curing significance testing https://t.co/UTrFoU8R9r Stop relying on parameters and p-values.
Not curing significance testing https://t.co/E33VtlYUTu @PeerJPreprintsさんから
Avanza discusión importante para re definir la significación estadística @inpsicon Not curing significance testing https://t.co/pMmvWQne2w vía @PeerJPreprints "ninguna de las herramientas estadísticas debería reemplazar las pruebas de significancia..."
62 days ago
RT @PeerJPreprints: Preprint: Manipulating the alpha level cannot cure significance testing – comments on "Redefine statistical significanc…
Preprint: Manipulating the alpha level cannot cure significance testing – comments on "Redefine statistical significance" (over 4,500 views) https://t.co/9YQLsMx4i2
62 days ago
Manipulating the #alphalevel cannot cure #significancetesting – comments on "Redefine statistical significance" #Methods
62 days ago
RT @Optentia: Manipulating the alpha value cannot cure significance testing. https://t.co/fCwvj0PXr5
RT @Optentia: Manipulating the alpha value cannot cure significance testing. https://t.co/fCwvj0PXr5
63 days ago
RT @kosugitti: 0.05を0.005とかそういう小手先の問題じゃねえんだ論文に名前を連ねました。 in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/v092vSl4kW #SciencePolicy #Statistics
63 days ago
Manipulating the alpha value cannot cure significance testing. https://t.co/fCwvj0PXr5
63 days ago
RT @kohske: p=0.005にしたらfalse positiveはそりゃ減るだろうけど、再現性が上がるってことは無いよなあ、って思ってたら、PeerJ論文 https://t.co/tCoNOC6w4v でちゃんと指摘されてた (p.8)。これちょっとシミュレーション…
RT @socpsyghent: On the value of a p-value: https://t.co/LGQJU6RyRR with @RensvdSchoot
64 days ago
RT @kosugitti: 0.05を0.005とかそういう小手先の問題じゃねえんだ論文に名前を連ねました。 in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/v092vSl4kW #SciencePolicy #Statistics
RT @socpsyghent: On the value of a p-value: https://t.co/LGQJU6RyRR with @RensvdSchoot
RT @socpsyghent: On the value of a p-value: https://t.co/LGQJU6RyRR with @RensvdSchoot
RT @socpsyghent: On the value of a p-value: https://t.co/LGQJU6RyRR with @RensvdSchoot
RT @socpsyghent: On the value of a p-value: https://t.co/LGQJU6RyRR with @RensvdSchoot
RT @socpsyghent: On the value of a p-value: https://t.co/LGQJU6RyRR with @RensvdSchoot
RT @socpsyghent: On the value of a p-value: https://t.co/LGQJU6RyRR with @RensvdSchoot
On the value of a p-value: https://t.co/LGQJU6RyRR with @RensvdSchoot
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies