Visitors   Views   Downloads

The performance of cleaner wrasse, Labroides dimidiatus, in a reversal learning task varies across experimental paradigms

View preprint
RT @SimonGingins: The way a cognitive experiment is run matters! Check our our new @PeerJPreprints on the impact of the experimental paradi…
RT @SimonGingins: The way a cognitive experiment is run matters! Check our our new @PeerJPreprints on the impact of the experimental paradi…
RT @SimonGingins: The way a cognitive experiment is run matters! Check our our new @PeerJPreprints on the impact of the experimental paradi…
The way a cognitive experiment is run matters! Check our our new @PeerJPreprints on the impact of the experimental paradigm on the performance of the cleaner wrasse in spatial learning and reversal learning. With @Fanny_Marcadier & @binsan5 https://t.co/MnYQxm3Nwf
10 days ago
The performance of cleaner wrasse, Labroides dimidiatus, in a reversal learning task varies across experimental paradigms https://t.co/K02VTJzumR
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Fanny Marcadier conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Sandra A Binning performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Sharon Wismer performed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Océane Krattinger performed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Fausto Quatttrini performed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Redouan Bshary conceived and designed the experiments, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Simon Gingins conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

All experiments were carried out in accordance with the Australian Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes, and under the approval of the Queensland Government (Australia) Department of Agriculture and Fisheries Animal Ethics Committee

Field Study Permissions

The following information was supplied relating to field study approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

All field activities were covered by a general Queensland Fisheries Permit and GBRMPA (Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authorities) permit granted to Lizard Island Research Station.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

1) Figshare

2) DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5032334

3) URL: https://figshare.com/s/c488a215345b7cc01975

Funding

This study was supported by funding from the Swiss Science Foundation to RB, the Fonds de Recherche du Québec- Nature et Technologies to SAB and a Lizard Island Reef Research Foundation doctoral fellowship to SW. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies