Visitors   Views   Downloads

Comparative description and ossification patterns of Dendropsophus labialis (Peters, 1863) and Scinax ruber (Laurenti, 1758)(Anura: Hylidae)

View preprint
19 days ago
RT @Angelicarenas77: Skeletal development of two hylids https://t.co/osPj00rMnX
Skeletal development of two hylids https://t.co/osPj00rMnX
29 days ago
Comparative description and ossification patterns of Dendropsophus labialis (Peters, 1863) and Scinax ruber… https://t.co/fWKmuPiAvk
My preprint has been published today in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/dHWuJH46Mz #Biodiversity #DevelopmentalBiology #EvolutionaryStudies
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Angélica Arenas Rodríguez conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Juan Francisco Rubiano conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments.

Julio Mario Hoyos conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

The samples are from the museum of Javeriana University, Bogotá Colombia.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data/code is included in the manuscript (results).

Funding

This work was supported by Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Paläontologisches Institut und Museum, Universität Zürich, and to the Departamento Administrativo de Ciencias, Tecnología e Innovación - COLCIENCIAS (Colombian government Institution - Convocatoria 511/2010). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies