Visitors   Views   Downloads

Good Practice for Conference Abstracts and Presentations: GP-CAP

View preprint
RT @cellohealth: What makes for good practice in #MedComms? Our very own Nina Kennard, with her peers @Wtrmdw, @Caudex_medical, @GreyHealth…
What makes for good practice in #MedComms? Our very own Nina Kennard, along with her peers @Wtrmdw, @Caudex_medical, @GreyHealth, @Shireplc & @iMedComms, have developed guidelines for conference abstracts & presentations, in pre-print in @thePeerJ https://t.co/ylvHbsAEIw https://t.co/OmyZBKsa2n
What makes for good practice in #MedComms? Our very own Nina Kennard, with her peers @Wtrmdw, @Caudex_medical, @GreyHealth, @Shireplc & @iMedComms, have developed guidelines for conference abstracts & presentations, in pre-print in @thePeerJ https://t.co/ylvHbsAEIw https://t.co/GguBtMXTcr
RT @cellohealth: Final call for comments! Our own Nina Kennard, #CMPP in collab with peers at @wtrmdw, @caudex_medical, @GreyHealth, @Shire…
Final call for comments! Our own Nina Kennard, #CMPP in collab with peers at @wtrmdw, @caudex_medical, @GreyHealth, @Shireplc & @iMedComms have developed guidelines good #publications practice for #conference #abstracts & presentations. Thoughts welcome? https://t.co/ylvHbsAEIw https://t.co/h5IVuYjxew
148 days ago
GP-CAP preprints available here: https://t.co/akxqsKyNFk. If you want to comment, be quick, we heard at #ismppeu18 that they're not up for much longer! #medcomms https://t.co/LuGzBTNQ93
RT @ChrisW_PharmaG: @MDDelahunty @blazingocelots @ISMPP @Official_EMWA @SideviewLiz You can read more on “Good Practice for Conference Abst…
149 days ago
RT @ChrisW_PharmaG: @MDDelahunty @blazingocelots @ISMPP @Official_EMWA @SideviewLiz You can read more on “Good Practice for Conference Abst…
RT @ChrisW_PharmaG: @MDDelahunty @blazingocelots @ISMPP @Official_EMWA @SideviewLiz You can read more on “Good Practice for Conference Abst…
RT @ChrisW_PharmaG: @MDDelahunty @blazingocelots @ISMPP @Official_EMWA @SideviewLiz You can read more on “Good Practice for Conference Abst…
RT @ChrisW_PharmaG: @MDDelahunty @blazingocelots @ISMPP @Official_EMWA @SideviewLiz You can read more on “Good Practice for Conference Abst…
RT @ChrisW_PharmaG: @MDDelahunty @blazingocelots @ISMPP @Official_EMWA @SideviewLiz You can read more on “Good Practice for Conference Abst…
RT @ChrisW_PharmaG: @MDDelahunty @blazingocelots @ISMPP @Official_EMWA @SideviewLiz You can read more on “Good Practice for Conference Abst…
@MDDelahunty @blazingocelots @ISMPP @Official_EMWA @SideviewLiz You can read more on “Good Practice for Conference Abstracts and Presentations” at https://t.co/2mu8f24IYd and https://t.co/r5iMGiIFTu #ISMPPEU18
Insightful discussion on how to make communications at congresses more transparent, consistent, and practical: https://t.co/HVp0qLEouJ
New preprint in #medcomms #scipub: Good practice for conference absracts and presentations https://t.co/aieCmoXk7o via @PeerJPreprints
Developing good practice for conference abstracts & presentations, please comment! https://t.co/LDNw1Vbvgb #pubplan #ismpp #medcomms #gpcap https://t.co/D4VN9iQnYz
237 days ago
RT @AshfieldHealth: #GP-CAP: With GPP3 now standard for articles, conference guidelines are now proposed: a preprint for comments is at htt…
#GP-CAP: With GPP3 now standard for articles, conference guidelines are now proposed: a preprint for comments is at https://t.co/MAbjEEwGYf
With GPP3 now standard for articles, a set of guidelines for conferences is proposed: a preprint for comment's here https://t.co/MAbjEEwGYf
238 days ago
RT @thePeerJ: Good Practice for Conference Abstracts and Presentations - some helpful #scicomm discussion shared @PeerJPreprints https://t.…
RT @thePeerJ: Good Practice for Conference Abstracts and Presentations - some helpful #scicomm discussion shared @PeerJPreprints https://t.…
RT @thePeerJ: Good Practice for Conference Abstracts and Presentations - some helpful #scicomm discussion shared @PeerJPreprints https://t.…
240 days ago
RT @thePeerJ: Good Practice for Conference Abstracts and Presentations - some helpful #scicomm discussion shared @PeerJPreprints https://t.…
RT @thePeerJ: Good Practice for Conference Abstracts and Presentations - some helpful #scicomm discussion shared @PeerJPreprints https://t.…
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

Cate Foster, Jackie Marchington, Steve Banner, Nina C Kennard & Rianne Stacey work for medical communication agencies that provide professional medical writing or editing services to not-for-profit and for-profit clients.

Elizabeth Wager is self-employed and provides training, consultancy and editing services on medical publishing and publication ethics for pharmaceutical companies, medical communication agencies, publishers, universities and academic societies. She is an Academic Editor for PeerJ.

Mina Patel and Antonia Panayi work in Medical Affairs functions within the pharmaceutical industry.

The content and opinions expressed in the article are the authors’ and do not necessarily reflect the policies or practices of their employers.

Author Contributions

Cate Foster conceived and designed the experiments, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Elizabeth Wager conceived and designed the experiments, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Jackie Marchington wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Mina Patel wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Steve Banner reviewed drafts of the paper.

Nina C Kennard reviewed drafts of the paper.

Antonia Panayi reviewed drafts of the paper.

Rianne Stacey reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

This article did not generate any data or code, as it is not based on scientific experiments.

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies