Visitors   Views   Downloads

Comparative transcriptomic analysis of heterophylly of the aquatic plant Potamogeton octandrus (Potamogetonaceae)

View preprint
Top @RNomics #tweeted story: Comparative transcriptomic analysis of heterophyll… https://t.co/nW61e16MLT, see more https://t.co/mx2YzvfCax
38 days ago
Comparative transcriptomic analysis of heterophylly of the aquatic plant Potamogeton octandrus (Potamogetonaceae) https://t.co/k4BD1qSGzU
Comparative transcriptomic analysis of heterophylly of the aquatic plant Potamogeton octandrus (Potamogetonaceae) https://t.co/KWh42xXnfL …
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Supplemental information for this article can be found online

Supplemental information for this article can be found online.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3336v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Dingxuan He conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables.

Pin Guo conceived and designed the experiments.

Paul F Gugger wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Youhao Guo contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools.

Xing Liu conceived and designed the experiments.

Jinming Chen wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

All the sequencing raw data was deposited to the NCBI Short Reads Archive (SRA) with the accession number SRR3184674.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

All the sequencing raw data was deposited to the NCBI Short Reads Archive (SRA) with the accession number SRR3184674.

Funding

This study was supported by the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (20110141110019), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 31270278 and 31570220), the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. XDPB02), and the Wuhan Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. Y655261W03). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies