Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Edilson Hobold performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Vitor Pires-Lopes analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Rossana Gomez-Campos conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Miguel Arruda conceived and designed the experiments, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Cynthia Lee Andruske wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper, grammar review.

Jaime Pacheco-Carrillo prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Marco Antonio Cossio-Bolaños conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Human Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

The study was conducted in accordance with the guidelines established by the Ethics Committee of the School of Medical Sciences of the University of Campinas (São Paulo, Brazil).

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Figshare: https://figshare.com/s/621ad7b810f83288f7e8

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies