Visitors   Views   Downloads

Idea farming: it is a good idea to have bad ideas in science

View preprint
Idea farming: it is a good idea to have bad ideas in science https://t.co/tkbQLuFeSK
Preprint article | Idea farming: it is a good idea to have bad ideas in science #PeerJ https://t.co/tDHqu0EPYc
49 days ago
RT @PeerJPreprints: Preprint: Idea farming: it is a good idea to have bad ideas in science https://t.co/XIJ9mSLTsZ https://t.co/T6Dq2EcENP
Preprint: Idea farming: it is a good idea to have bad ideas in science https://t.co/XIJ9mSLTsZ https://t.co/T6Dq2EcENP
RT @Protohedgehog: "We need to embrace science as a process- driven human endeavour." Yep. Not the facade it is now. https://t.co/NxyhZ6NuM…
"We need to embrace science as a process- driven human endeavour." Yep. Not the facade it is now. https://t.co/NxyhZ6NuMK @PeerJPreprints
RT @cjlortie: Idea provenance in science https://t.co/I7rROVfAzr via @PeerJPreprints #openscience
RT @cjlortie: Idea provenance in science https://t.co/I7rROVfAzr via @PeerJPreprints #openscience
RT @cjlortie: Idea provenance in science https://t.co/I7rROVfAzr via @PeerJPreprints #openscience
54 days ago
RT @cjlortie: Idea provenance in science https://t.co/I7rROVfAzr via @PeerJPreprints #openscience
Bad ideas in science are good ideas! https://t.co/I7rROVfAzr
RT @cjlortie: Idea provenance in science https://t.co/I7rROVfAzr via @PeerJPreprints #openscience
Idea provenance in science https://t.co/I7rROVfAzr via @PeerJPreprints #openscience
55 days ago
Idea farming: it is a good idea to have bad ideas in science https://t.co/iQ8u0ZzXkv
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Additional Information

Competing Interests

Chris Lortie is an Academic Editor for PeerJ.

Author Contributions

Christopher J Lortie conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

https://cjlortie.github.io/bad.ideas/

Funding

This work was not supported by any funding.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies