Disease dynamics and potential mitigation among restored and wild staghorn coral, Acropora cervicornis

NOAA-National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Miami, Florida, United States
Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, United States
Department of Environmental Science and Policy, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, United States
DOI
10.7287/peerj.preprints.328v1
Subject Areas
Conservation Biology, Ecology, Histology, Marine Biology
Keywords
recovery, histopathology, Florida Keys, tropical storm, incidence
Copyright
© 2014 Miller et al.
Licence
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ PrePrints) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
Cite this article
Miller MW, Lohr KE, Cameron CM, Williams DE, Peters EC. 2014. Disease dynamics and potential mitigation among restored and wild staghorn coral, Acropora cervicornis. PeerJ PrePrints 2:e328v1

Abstract

The threatened status (both ecologically and legally) of Caribbean staghorn coral, Acropora cervicornis, has prompted rapidly expanding efforts in culture and restocking, although tissue loss diseases continue to affect populations. In this study, disease surveillance and histopathological characterization were used to compare disease dynamics and conditions in both restored and extant wild populations. Disease had devastating effects on both wild and restored populations, but dynamics were highly variable and appeared to be site-specific with no significant differences in disease prevalence between wild versus restored sites. Disease affected up to 80% of colonies at one site following a tropical storm. A subset of 20 haphazardly selected colonies at each site observed over a single field season revealed widely varying disease incidence, although not in a consistent way between restored and wild sites, and a case fatality rate of 8%. Lastly, two field mitigation techniques, (1) excision of apparently healthy branch tips from a diseased colony, and (2) placement of a band of epoxy fully enclosing the diseased margin, gave equivocal results with no significant benefit detected for either treatment compared to controls. Tissue condition of associated samples was fair to very poor; unsuccessful mitigation treatment samples had severe degeneration of mesenterial filament cnidoglandular bands. Polyp mucocytes in all samples were infected with suspect rickettsia-like organisms; no bacterial aggregates were found. Overall results do not support differing disease quality, quantity, dynamics, or health management strategies between restored and wild colonies of A. cervicornis in the Florida Keys.

Supplemental Information

Supplemental Information 1

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.328v1/supp-1