NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

The unique and common OTUs and their taxonomic annotation in the four different samples

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3278v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Zhuo Zhang performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables.

Luyun Luo performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables.

Xinqiu Tan performed the experiments, analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Xiao Kong performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables.

Jianguo Yang performed the experiments.

Duanhua Wang performed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Deyong Zhang analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Decai Jin conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Yong Liu conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The sequences obtained were deposited in the SRA database short-read archive SRR5075731-SRR5075746.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science and Technology Pillar Program during the 12th Five-year Plan Period (2014BAD05B04-4), the Agriculture Research System of China (CARS-25-B-05) and the Innovation Platform and Talent Plan (2016RS2019). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
2 Citations   Views   Downloads