Assessing intraspecific genetic diversity from community DNA metabarcoding data

Aquatic Ecosytem Research, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, NRW, Germany
Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
Centre for Water and Environmental Research (ZWU) Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, NRW, Germany
DOI
10.7287/peerj.preprints.3269v1
Subject Areas
Biogeography, Bioinformatics, Molecular Biology, Freshwater Biology
Keywords
high-throughput sequencing, metabarcoding, ecosystem assessment, haplotyping, population genetics
Copyright
© 2017 Elbrecht et al.
Licence
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ Preprints) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
Cite this article
Elbrecht V, Vamos EE, Steinke D, Leese F. 2017. Assessing intraspecific genetic diversity from community DNA metabarcoding data. PeerJ Preprints 5:e3269v1

Abstract

DNA metabarcoding provides species composition data for entire communities, yet information on intraspecific diversity is usually lost during data analysis. The capacity to infer intraspecific genetic diversity within whole communities would, however, represent a leap forward for ecological monitoring and conservation. We developed an amplicon-based sequence denoising approach that allows the identification of haplotypes from metabarcoding data sets and demonstrate its power with two freshwater macroinvertebrate data sets.

Author Comment

Initial version of the manuscript, soon to be submitted to nature ecology & evolution. We would love to get some feedback/criticism from you before submitting it!

Supplemental Information

Figure S1: Schematic overview of errors affecting metabarcoding data and clustering / denoising strategies to reduce them

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3269v1/supp-1

Figure S2: Effect of different quality filtering (may ee) on reads of the singe species mock sample

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3269v1/supp-2

Figure S3: Effect of different alpha values in read denoising of the singe species mock sample

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3269v1/supp-3

Figure S4: Detailed plots of four example taxa from the denoised monitoring samples, showing haplotype maps & networks, similarity between replicates and sequence alignment for all BF/BR primer sets

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3269v1/supp-4

Figure S5: Overview of the haplotyping strategy used here and their implementation in the JAMP R package

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3269v1/supp-5

Table S1: Finland haplotype table (for all 4 different primer combinations)

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3269v1/supp-6

Scripts S1: Metabarcoding and denoising pipeline, and additional scripts used to produce the figures

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3269v1/supp-7

Manuscript work file for providing feedback

Please use track changes / comment functions. Thank you for your feedback.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3269v1/supp-8