Visitors   Views   Downloads

A case of mistaken identity: ‘Latvius’ obrutus and new dipnoans from the Frasnian of Stolbovo, Russia

View preprint
New #SVPCA2017 preprint - ‘Latvius’ obrutus and new dipnoans from the Frasnian of Stolbovo, Russia https://t.co/D3fZWf4fhL
76 days ago
PJpreprint: A case of mistaken identity: ‘Latvius’ obrutus and new dipnoans from the Frasnian of Stolbovo, Russia https://t.co/EiJfnjLMaW
77 days ago
A case of mistaken identity: ‘Latvius’ obrutus and new dipnoans from the Frasnian of Stolbovo, Russia https://t.co/bPQPf8siRE
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.
Highlighted in SVPCA/SPPC 2017

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Tom Challands conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Oleg Lebedev conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Matt Friedman performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Natasha Krupina performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The data in this preprint abstract is preliminary.

Funding

This work was supported by a University of Edinburgh Moray Endowment Fund awarded to Tom Challands. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies