Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Supplemental Information S1

Supplemental Information document number 1, detailing further information on the specimens used and their accession numbers. Table S1.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3222v1/supp-1

Supplemental Information S2

Supplemental Information document number 2, detailing further information on landmark identification and error analyses. Tables S2-S5.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3222v1/supp-2

Supplemental Information S3

Supplemental Information document number 3, detailing further results of principal component analyses, in addition to results of tests for convergence at both the species and specimen level. Tables S6-S10.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3222v1/supp-3

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Charlotte E Page conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Natalie Cooper conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Data:

NHM Data Portal

Website/DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5519/0082274

[We have been having some server issues at NHM so this DOI may not currently be resolvable, however all data used for the analysis is available in the GitHub repo).

Code (and data)

GitHub

DOI:10.5281/zenodo.846278

Website: https://github.com/NaturalHistoryMuseum/river-dolphin-convergence

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies