Visitors   Views   Downloads

Opinionated analysis development

View preprint
RT @seanjtaylor: I ❤️ how Hilary thinks about design and process for data science. Wish I could have seen the talk! You probably also want…
RT @seanjtaylor: I ❤️ how Hilary thinks about design and process for data science. Wish I could have seen the talk! You probably also want…
RT @seanjtaylor: I ❤️ how Hilary thinks about design and process for data science. Wish I could have seen the talk! You probably also want…
32 days ago
RT @seanjtaylor: I ❤️ how Hilary thinks about design and process for data science. Wish I could have seen the talk! You probably also want…
RT @seanjtaylor: I ❤️ how Hilary thinks about design and process for data science. Wish I could have seen the talk! You probably also want…
32 days ago
RT @seanjtaylor: I ❤️ how Hilary thinks about design and process for data science. Wish I could have seen the talk! You probably also want…
32 days ago
RT @seanjtaylor: I ❤️ how Hilary thinks about design and process for data science. Wish I could have seen the talk! You probably also want…
RT @seanjtaylor: I ❤️ how Hilary thinks about design and process for data science. Wish I could have seen the talk! You probably also want…
I ❤️ how Hilary thinks about design and process for data science. Wish I could have seen the talk! You probably also want to read her recent paper: https://t.co/Emid3VEuDz https://t.co/qEDE2K6OQO
49 days ago
@skyetetra @DanHudsonPhD @hugobowne @DataCamp @dmi3k @quaesita yeah, either that or "analysis development". preprint here: https://t.co/hTlrVLdClf
RT @vsbuffalo: IMO, this is how science should look at papers with honest mistakes — a culture of blameless postmortems. Data science is ah…
RT @vsbuffalo: IMO, this is how science should look at papers with honest mistakes — a culture of blameless postmortems. Data science is ah…
RT @vsbuffalo: IMO, this is how science should look at papers with honest mistakes — a culture of blameless postmortems. Data science is ah…
124 days ago
RT @vsbuffalo: IMO, this is how science should look at papers with honest mistakes — a culture of blameless postmortems. Data science is ah…
124 days ago
RT @vsbuffalo: IMO, this is how science should look at papers with honest mistakes — a culture of blameless postmortems. Data science is ah…
124 days ago
RT @vsbuffalo: IMO, this is how science should look at papers with honest mistakes — a culture of blameless postmortems. Data science is ah…
IMO, this is how science should look at papers with honest mistakes — a culture of blameless postmortems. Data science is ahead of the curve here. See also @hspter's paper https://t.co/fCQq7iCEtG https://t.co/Ck8SepGXjN
125 days ago
@hspter is there a tidy data/google sheet/rmd that show the content in table 1 in your opinionated analysis development paper? :) https://t.co/DydaHbaFEv
140 days ago
Opinionated analysis development @hspter @stitchfix https://t.co/jpWJzkIyic https://t.co/MtngEu3JRV
To follow up for those interested: the paper is "Opinionated analysis development" in PeerJ https://t.co/ugyLX47h0L . Looks like a good read, @hspter !
146 days ago
RT @NSSDeviations: Episode 56 mentions @hspter‘s paper on Opinionated Analysis Development but the link was accidentally omitted from the s…
Episode 56 mentions @hspter‘s paper on Opinionated Analysis Development but the link was accidentally omitted from the show notes. Here’s the paper: https://t.co/7BfSAMejuV
146 days ago
@ChrisBeeley @NSSDeviations Sorry, I forgot the link! Here it is: https://t.co/ymzvqBFDX1
172 days ago
Opinionated analysis development https://t.co/XtI9hQrwhk via @PeerJPreprints by @hspter
193 days ago
RT @EmilyRiederer: "Opinionated data analysis" by @hspter https://t.co/peT7GDia3X
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

I am an employee of Stitch Fix, a private company.

Author Contributions

Hilary Parker conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The research in this article did not generate any data or code.

Funding

This work was done while an employee at Stitch Fix. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies