Visitors   Views   Downloads

What affects power to estimate speciation rate shifts?

View preprint
RT @speciation_pubs: peerJ: What affects power to estimate speciation rate shifts? https://t.co/4Nr1LJNMbt
RT @speciation_pubs: peerJ: What affects power to estimate speciation rate shifts? https://t.co/4Nr1LJNMbt
RT @speciation_pubs: peerJ: What affects power to estimate speciation rate shifts? https://t.co/4Nr1LJNMbt
RT @speciation_pubs: peerJ: What affects power to estimate speciation rate shifts? https://t.co/4Nr1LJNMbt
87 days ago
What affects power to estimate speciation rate shifts? https://t.co/bIPSCJvXVX
peerJ: What affects power to estimate speciation rate shifts? https://t.co/4Nr1LJNMbt
Preprint: Tree size and relative clade age influence estimation of speciation rate shifts https://t.co/xlLMMGAviS https://t.co/kvT7J6iaju
RT @speciation_pubs: peerJ: Tree size and relative clade age influence estimation of speciation rate shifts https://t.co/msIKECvQjd
299 days ago
RT @speciation_pubs: peerJ: Tree size and relative clade age influence estimation of speciation rate shifts https://t.co/msIKECvQjd
RT @PLOSPaleo: Tree size and relative clade age influence estimation of speciation rate shifts https://t.co/OKC4UJVb9p via @PeerJPreprints
Tree size and relative clade age influence estimation of speciation rate shifts https://t.co/OKC4UJVb9p via @PeerJPreprints
300 days ago
Tree size and relative clade age influence estimation of speciation rate shifts https://t.co/lHqrFzU2Jb
peerJ: Tree size and relative clade age influence estimation of speciation rate shifts https://t.co/msIKECvQjd
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Variation in basetree:subtree size ratio in trees from Simulation Set 1

Variation in ratio of the number of basetree:subtree tips for trees from Simulation Set 1 across the three Sages (A: 20%, B: 40% and C: 60%) and speciation rate asymmetry values (Y axis) and tree size classes (X axis; 50±10, 100±10, 200±10, 400±10 and 800±1). The ratios are colour coded according to the legends

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3206v2/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests

Author Contributions

Ullasa Kodandaramaiah conceived and designed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Gopal Murali conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Figshare; https://figshare.com/s/cb85b1db6a64328b36f9

Funding

The work was funded by IISER Thiruvananthapuram intra-mural funding (through MHRD, Government of India) and an INSPIRE Faculty Award to UK. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies