Visitors   Views   Downloads

Documenting and evaluating Data Science contributions in academic promotion in Departments of Statistics and Biostatistics

View preprint
Preprint: Documenting and evaluating Data Science contributions in academic promotion in Statistics + Biostatistics https://t.co/HK0yQkptfU
Documenting and evaluating Data Science contributions in academic promotion in stats/biostats depts https://t.co/i7qb2XCy9a
Article from Lance Waller at Emory about how academia can recognize contributions to data science https://t.co/VfmtgNGH28 https://t.co/N0ah8s1ej6
85 days ago
RT @jtleek: This from Lance Waller is brilliant for academic data scientists: https://t.co/IrslLlwqYc
85 days ago
This from Lance Waller is brilliant for academic data scientists: https://t.co/IrslLlwqYc
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The author declares that he has no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Lance A Waller conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The research in this article did not generate any data or code. The article involves a review of the typical academic promotion process and make suggestions for a strategic approach for documenting and evaluating data science contributions within reviews for academic promotion.

Funding

The author received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies