"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Supplemental Table S1

Eurasian nutcracker (Nucifraga caryocatactes) sample codes, geographic location, voucher number from Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture – University of Washington, and GenBank accession numbers.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.319v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors find no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Kimberly M Dohms conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Theresa M Burg conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

We did not handle any live vertebrate animals during this study. All animals sequenced here were sequenced from tissue samples provided by the Burke Museum, thus animal care approval was not required for this specific study.

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

For sequences acquired during our labwork, accession numbers from GenBank will be provided prior to publication.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of related data:

GenBank. Accession numbers to be determined.


Funding for this project was provided by a Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Discovery Grant (TMB) and Post-Graduate Scholarship D (KMD) and Alberta Innovates (AI) New Faculty Award (TMB) and Graduate Scholarship (KMD). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads