Visitors   Views   Downloads

Bats of the Philippine Islands –a review of research directions and relevance to national-level priorities and targets

View preprint
250 days ago
Bats of the Philippine Islands –a review of research directions and relevance to national-level priorities and targets https://t.co/KUM6pzPoEl
RT @KlausRiede: Bat research efforts in the Philippines: a post-millennium review to identify future research prospects and priorities http…
Bat research efforts in the Philippines: a post-millennium review to identify future research prospects and priorities https://t.co/0HpDMCDOrU via @PeerJPreprints
372 days ago
Bat research efforts in the Philippines: a post-millennium review to identify future research prospects and priorities https://t.co/jD5UBSki3c
453 days ago
Bat research efforts in the Philippines: a post-millennium review to identify future research prospects and… https://t.co/Ghb0K72uvl
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Krizler C Tanalgo conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Alice C Hughes conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

https://figshare.com/s/4f7f7abef96b0bb6ac2d

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies