Visitors   Views   Downloads

Response to “An exceptionally preserved 110 million years old praying mantis provides new insights into the predatory behaviour of early mantodeans”

View preprint
27 days ago
RT @CMNHentomology: Check out PhD Candidate Brannoch and Curator Svenson's preprint rebuttal to a fossil mantis paper https://t.co/dD7eLrIt…
Response to “An exceptionally preserved 110 million years old praying mantis provides new insights into the… https://t.co/9E4AJ62Oyq
RT @skbrannoch: G. Svenson and I published a response to a recently published fossil mantis paper in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/CxX8U3XHW6
@EntsocAmerica @EntCollNtwrk a pub'd critical response (https://t.co/qKXrH3Pxjq) to a fossil pub (orig article: https://t.co/xPrqHKgaQy)
Response to “An exceptional 110 million year old praying mantis provides new insights into predatory behaviour” https://t.co/ARZkj23W6v
RT @skbrannoch: G. Svenson and I published a response to a recently published fossil mantis paper in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/CxX8U3XHW6
RT @skbrannoch: G. Svenson and I published a response to a recently published fossil mantis paper in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/CxX8U3XHW6
G. Svenson and I published a response to a recently published fossil mantis paper in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/CxX8U3XHW6
90 days ago
Response to “An exceptionally preserved 110 million years old praying mantis provides new insights into the… https://t.co/3RVyq0tJ4S
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Sydney K. Brannoch wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Gavin J. Svenson wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The research in this article did not generate any data or code as it is a response to a publication.

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies