Visitors   Views   Downloads

Differences in the use of surface water resources by desert birds are revealed using isotopic tracers

View preprint
21 days ago
Differences in the use of surface water resources by desert birds are revealed using isotopic tracers https://t.co/XeBcNBxdiH
peerJ: Differences in the use of surface water resources by desert birds are revealed using isotopic tracers https://t.co/3ASMSxXCpO
RT @IBIS_journal: Differences in the use of surface water resources by desert birds is revealed using isotopic tracers https://t.co/0FOSfCb…
50 days ago
Differences in the use of surface water resources by desert birds is revealed using isotopic tracers https://t.co/0FOSfCbykf | @thePeerJ | #ornithology
97 days ago
Differences in the use of surface water resources by desert birds is revealed using isotopic tracers https://t.co/FSF7nBjfLL
peerJ: Differences in the use of surface water resources by desert birds is revealed using isotopic tracers https://t.co/u0XseTtmLq
peerJ: Surface water dependency among Kalahari Desert birds https://t.co/1Xqf97FeLy
482 days ago
Surface water dependency among Kalahari Desert birds https://t.co/1itR1dY4DI
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Table S1 and Table S2

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3167v3/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Stephan Woodborne is an employee of iThemba LABS.

Author Contributions

Ben Smit conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, approved the final draft.

Stephan Woodborne contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Blair O Wolf conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Andrew E McKechnie conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

University of Pretoria’s Animal Use and Care Committee (clearance #EC058-09)

Field Study Permissions

The following information was supplied relating to field study approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Department of Environment and Nature Conservation (FAUNA 721/2010)

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Figshare

doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5313910

https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5313910.v1

Funding

This research was supported by funding from National Research Foundation and the DST/NRF Centre of Excellence at the Percy FitzPatrick Institute to AEM. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies