The many forms of beta diversity: a comment on McGill et al. and some notational suggestions

Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis, CEES, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
DOI
10.7287/peerj.preprints.3157v1
Subject Areas
Biodiversity, Ecology
Keywords
community ecology, Biodiversity change, β-diversity, species turnover, beta diversity
Copyright
© 2017 Jeppsson
Licence
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ Preprints) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
Cite this article
Jeppsson T. 2017. The many forms of beta diversity: a comment on McGill et al. and some notational suggestions. PeerJ Preprints 5:e3157v1

Abstract

Fundamentally, beta diversity is a measure of species turnover across time or space. In practice, it is sometimes unclear exactly what aspect of beta diversity that is implied in studies. For instance, a trend in ’spatial beta diversity’ can be used to refer to both differences in spatial beta diversity between sites, as well as a temporal trend in spatial beta diversity (at the same site). In a recent review, McGill et al. [1] provide a useful and much needed overview of different aspects of biodiversity change, and show areas where we lack knowledge. Even so, McGill et al. ignore some aspects of beta diversity and sometimes pool different types of beta diversity under the same heading. However, their review mainly focused on temporal trends in diversity, while I here want to highlight spatial patterns in temporal β -diversity (species turnover) as an important but somewhat overlooked component of biodiversity change. Furthermore, I propose a slightly modified classification and nomenclature of metrics of biodiversity change, with the aim of complementing their review. The notation used here can hopefully be useful to other authors as well.

Author Comment

The original manuscript was written in 2015 and submitted as a comment to Trends in Ecology and Evolution (on McGill et al 2015, doi:10.1016/j.tree.2014.11.006), but it was never published.