Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Supplemental Table S1 The detailed information of Lagerstroemia accessions used in this study

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3141v1/supp-1

Supplemental Table S2 Nucleotide sequences of 761 successfully amplified EST-SSRs in this study

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3141v1/supp-2

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Yuanjun Ye conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Lu Feng performed the experiments, analyzed the data.

Yiqian Ju performed the experiments, analyzed the data.

Ming Cai contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Tangren Cheng reviewed drafts of the paper.

Jia Wang reviewed drafts of the paper.

Qixiang Zhang reviewed drafts of the paper.

Huitang Pan conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data/code is included in the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by The 12th Five Years Key Programs for Science and Technology Development of China (no. 2013BAD01B07), the National Science Foundation of China (no. 31470695), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No.BLYJ201612) and Scientific Program from Fujian Province (no. 2014N3012). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies