4 Citations   Views   Downloads

The State of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles

View preprint
RT @swipp_it: 3 reports on open discussed by @KristenRatan at #FORCE2018 keynote: https://t.co/HWsjiJN7Yu https://t.co/MH0k87SayP https:/…
3 reports on open discussed by @KristenRatan at #FORCE2018 keynote: https://t.co/HWsjiJN7Yu https://t.co/MH0k87SayP https://t.co/QKXawc1CC5
42 days ago
RT @jasonpriem: "The State of #OA," our paper analyzing #openaccess progress, was a 2017 hit on @thePeerJ! Congrats to my awesome coautho…
The State of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles https://t.co/MQ6qyguYxS via @PeerJPreprints
91 days ago
RT @seinecle: Harvard Business Review: "It’s Time to Make Business School Research More Relevant" https://t.co/5hN5ab0vhd -> yes! But 75%…
RT @seinecle: Harvard Business Review: "It’s Time to Make Business School Research More Relevant" https://t.co/5hN5ab0vhd -> yes! But 75%…
Harvard Business Review: "It’s Time to Make Business School Research More Relevant" https://t.co/5hN5ab0vhd -> yes! But 75% of it is behind paywalls, how can practitioners even *access* it? source of the chart: https://t.co/lAycA0ywbs https://t.co/HchsONVLBV
RT @cryptaneax: The State of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles https://t.co/enXJfRvl1H
105 days ago
The State of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles https://t.co/enXJfRvl1H
RT @germanabarata: @lisushi Fortunately the demands on #openaccess journals are growing. Here a nice paper with more data: https://t.co/2dM…
@lisushi Fortunately the demands on #openaccess journals are growing. Here a nice paper with more data: https://t.co/2dMzAph95S
Hi @Crossref @thePeerJ, do you crossreference @PeerJPreprints in metadata (and vice versa)? I've been checking for e.g. https://t.co/OjsUnAyJDO and https://t.co/ikg9xHFuVa - but no? #metadata #preprints
The State of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles https://t.co/Q4N6z8pemJ vía @PeerJPreprints
249 days ago
RT @researchremix: Thanks also to everyone who gave us feedback on our preprint, some on the preprint at @PeerJ itself (https://t.co/IdclZY…
249 days ago
RT @researchremix: Thanks also to everyone who gave us feedback on our preprint, some on the preprint at @PeerJ itself (https://t.co/IdclZY…
RT @researchremix: Thanks also to everyone who gave us feedback on our preprint, some on the preprint at @PeerJ itself (https://t.co/IdclZY…
RT @researchremix: Thanks also to everyone who gave us feedback on our preprint, some on the preprint at @PeerJ itself (https://t.co/IdclZY…
RT @researchremix: Thanks also to everyone who gave us feedback on our preprint, some on the preprint at @PeerJ itself (https://t.co/IdclZY…
RT @researchremix: Thanks also to everyone who gave us feedback on our preprint, some on the preprint at @PeerJ itself (https://t.co/IdclZY…
250 days ago
RT @researchremix: Thanks also to everyone who gave us feedback on our preprint, some on the preprint at @PeerJ itself (https://t.co/IdclZY…
RT @researchremix: Thanks also to everyone who gave us feedback on our preprint, some on the preprint at @PeerJ itself (https://t.co/IdclZY…
RT @researchremix: Thanks also to everyone who gave us feedback on our preprint, some on the preprint at @PeerJ itself (https://t.co/IdclZY…
RT @researchremix: Thanks also to everyone who gave us feedback on our preprint, some on the preprint at @PeerJ itself (https://t.co/IdclZY…
Thanks also to everyone who gave us feedback on our preprint, some on the preprint at @PeerJ itself (https://t.co/IdclZYhkXF) and some on twitter etc. You've influenced the manuscript and our thinking. #openscience
251 days ago
@lisalibrarian Really? I though the term "gold open access journal" was pretty standard? Also I don't usually call Hybrid OA articles Gold? I use terminology used in this paper https://t.co/5htwzIqH9X
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Additional Information

Competing Interests

Heather Piwowar and Jason Priem are founders of Impactstory, a non-profit company which makes Unpaywall, oaDOI, and other tools to improve scholarly communication.

Author Contributions

Heather Piwowar conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Jason Priem conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Vincent Larivière conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Juan Pablo Alperin conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Lisa Matthias performed the experiments, analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Bree Norlander analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Ashley Farley wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Jevin West reviewed drafts of the paper.

Stefanie Haustein conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.837902

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies