Visitors   Views   Downloads

The State of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles

View preprint
RT @MsPhelps: @oaDOI_org @researchremix @jasonpriem @clarivate Comparing current OA numbers in WoS with analysis of WoS sample in https://t…
RT @MsPhelps: @oaDOI_org @researchremix @jasonpriem @clarivate Comparing current OA numbers in WoS with analysis of WoS sample in https://t…
12 hours ago
RT @MsPhelps: @oaDOI_org @researchremix @jasonpriem @clarivate Comparing current OA numbers in WoS with analysis of WoS sample in https://t…
@oaDOI_org @researchremix @jasonpriem @clarivate Comparing current OA numbers in WoS with analysis of WoS sample in https://t.co/ikg9xHFuVa - why would % green be so much less now? (3.9% for articles+reviews 2009-2015, 11.5% in similar sample in preprint data) https://t.co/WfwjnSPGmX
RT @skrashen: "… at least 28% of the scholarly literature is Open Access .. this proportion is growing … (Open access articles) receive 18%…
RT @skrashen: "… at least 28% of the scholarly literature is Open Access .. this proportion is growing … (Open access articles) receive 18%…
RT @skrashen: "… at least 28% of the scholarly literature is Open Access .. this proportion is growing … (Open access articles) receive 18%…
RT @skrashen: "… at least 28% of the scholarly literature is Open Access .. this proportion is growing … (Open access articles) receive 18%…
RT @skrashen: "… at least 28% of the scholarly literature is Open Access .. this proportion is growing … (Open access articles) receive 18%…
"… at least 28% of the scholarly literature is Open Access .. this proportion is growing … (Open access articles) receive 18% more citations than average." https://t.co/o2yY3J5YBV
RT @tomstafford: Open Access articles receive 18% more citations than average https://t.co/h8oJozegZL
Open Access articles receive 18% more citations than average https://t.co/h8oJozegZL
RT @ProjectOpenUP: The State of #OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of #OpenAccess articles by @researchremix et al. v…
RT @ProjectOpenUP: The State of #OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of #OpenAccess articles by @researchremix et al. v…
14 days ago
The State of #OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of #OpenAccess articles by @researchremix et al. via @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/zVLesg9zar
RT @Protohedgehog: Awesome from @catmacOA on the current state of #openaccess publishing. 1: https://t.co/JpvlstfJGS 2: https://t.co/93FUwa…
RT @Protohedgehog: Awesome from @catmacOA on the current state of #openaccess publishing. 1: https://t.co/JpvlstfJGS 2: https://t.co/93FUwa…
RT @Protohedgehog: Awesome from @catmacOA on the current state of #openaccess publishing. 1: https://t.co/JpvlstfJGS 2: https://t.co/93FUwa…
RT @l_matthia: Successfully reproduced our results earlier thanks to @annakrystalli and Andrew, and just now mentioned in @catmacOA's talk.…
RT @l_matthia: Successfully reproduced our results earlier thanks to @annakrystalli and Andrew, and just now mentioned in @catmacOA's talk.…
RT @l_matthia: Successfully reproduced our results earlier thanks to @annakrystalli and Andrew, and just now mentioned in @catmacOA's talk.…
RT @l_matthia: Successfully reproduced our results earlier thanks to @annakrystalli and Andrew, and just now mentioned in @catmacOA's talk.…
RT @l_matthia: Successfully reproduced our results earlier thanks to @annakrystalli and Andrew, and just now mentioned in @catmacOA's talk.…
RT @l_matthia: Successfully reproduced our results earlier thanks to @annakrystalli and Andrew, and just now mentioned in @catmacOA's talk.…
RT @l_matthia: Successfully reproduced our results earlier thanks to @annakrystalli and Andrew, and just now mentioned in @catmacOA's talk.…
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

Heather Piwowar and Jason Priem are founders of Impactstory, a non-profit company which makes Unpaywall, oaDOI, and other tools to improve scholarly communication.

Author Contributions

Heather Piwowar conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Jason Priem conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Vincent Larivière conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Juan Pablo Alperin conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Lisa Matthias performed the experiments, analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Bree Norlander analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Ashley Farley wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Jevin West reviewed drafts of the paper.

Stefanie Haustein conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.837902

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies