Visitors   Views   Downloads

The State of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles

View preprint
RT @germanabarata: @lisushi Fortunately the demands on #openaccess journals are growing. Here a nice paper with more data: https://t.co/2dM…
@lisushi Fortunately the demands on #openaccess journals are growing. Here a nice paper with more data: https://t.co/2dMzAph95S
Hi @Crossref @thePeerJ, do you crossreference @PeerJPreprints in metadata (and vice versa)? I've been checking for e.g. https://t.co/OjsUnAyJDO and https://t.co/ikg9xHFuVa - but no? #metadata #preprints
The State of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles https://t.co/Q4N6z8pemJ vía @PeerJPreprints
70 days ago
RT @researchremix: Thanks also to everyone who gave us feedback on our preprint, some on the preprint at @PeerJ itself (https://t.co/IdclZY…
70 days ago
RT @researchremix: Thanks also to everyone who gave us feedback on our preprint, some on the preprint at @PeerJ itself (https://t.co/IdclZY…
RT @researchremix: Thanks also to everyone who gave us feedback on our preprint, some on the preprint at @PeerJ itself (https://t.co/IdclZY…
RT @researchremix: Thanks also to everyone who gave us feedback on our preprint, some on the preprint at @PeerJ itself (https://t.co/IdclZY…
RT @researchremix: Thanks also to everyone who gave us feedback on our preprint, some on the preprint at @PeerJ itself (https://t.co/IdclZY…
RT @researchremix: Thanks also to everyone who gave us feedback on our preprint, some on the preprint at @PeerJ itself (https://t.co/IdclZY…
71 days ago
RT @researchremix: Thanks also to everyone who gave us feedback on our preprint, some on the preprint at @PeerJ itself (https://t.co/IdclZY…
RT @researchremix: Thanks also to everyone who gave us feedback on our preprint, some on the preprint at @PeerJ itself (https://t.co/IdclZY…
RT @researchremix: Thanks also to everyone who gave us feedback on our preprint, some on the preprint at @PeerJ itself (https://t.co/IdclZY…
RT @researchremix: Thanks also to everyone who gave us feedback on our preprint, some on the preprint at @PeerJ itself (https://t.co/IdclZY…
Thanks also to everyone who gave us feedback on our preprint, some on the preprint at @PeerJ itself (https://t.co/IdclZYhkXF) and some on twitter etc. You've influenced the manuscript and our thinking. #openscience
72 days ago
@lisalibrarian Really? I though the term "gold open access journal" was pretty standard? Also I don't usually call Hybrid OA articles Gold? I use terminology used in this paper https://t.co/5htwzIqH9X
The State of OA https://t.co/Mw99csCk1t via @PeerJPreprints
90 days ago
RT @oaDOI_org: @aarontay @ryregier @chrisbulock The precision and recall of @oadoi and 1science are the same, assuming reasonable CIs and s…
90 days ago
@aarontay @ryregier @chrisbulock The precision and recall of @oadoi and 1science are the same, assuming reasonable CIs and similar populations (ie, year of publication, etc): ~98% precision and ~75% recall. https://t.co/ozuq2GOqRW https://t.co/Jcqk20WPEd https://t.co/VrKCyRTti5
The State of Open Access: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles https://t.co/qFiVb67J3u via @PeerJPreprints
RT @Protohedgehog: Also mentioned at #AcadAPE, this similar-is study on the state of OA by @researchremix @jasonpriem @lariviev @juancomman…
RT @Protohedgehog: Also mentioned at #AcadAPE, this similar-is study on the state of OA by @researchremix @jasonpriem @lariviev @juancomman…
100 days ago
RT @Protohedgehog: Also mentioned at #AcadAPE, this similar-is study on the state of OA by @researchremix @jasonpriem @lariviev @juancomman…
RT @Protohedgehog: Also mentioned at #AcadAPE, this similar-is study on the state of OA by @researchremix @jasonpriem @lariviev @juancomman…
Also mentioned at #AcadAPE, this similar-is study on the state of OA by @researchremix @jasonpriem @lariviev @juancommander @l_matthia @bree_uw @ashleydfarley @jevinwest and @stefhaustein https://t.co/93FUwakXWd (also @PeerJPreprints)
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Additional Information

Competing Interests

Heather Piwowar and Jason Priem are founders of Impactstory, a non-profit company which makes Unpaywall, oaDOI, and other tools to improve scholarly communication.

Author Contributions

Heather Piwowar conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Jason Priem conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Vincent Larivière conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Juan Pablo Alperin conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Lisa Matthias performed the experiments, analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Bree Norlander analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Ashley Farley wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Jevin West reviewed drafts of the paper.

Stefanie Haustein conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.837902

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies