Visitors   Views   Downloads

The data and analysis underlying NIH’s decision to cap research support lacked rigor and transparency: a commentary

View preprint
138 days ago
NIH's decision to cap research support https://t.co/fHWPCVFKV0 via @PeerJPreprints
RT @cecilejanssens: NIH withdrew the 'data-driven' grant support cap before we could finish our evaluation ... So, for the records: https:/…
NIH withdrew the 'data-driven' grant support cap before we could finish our evaluation ... So, for the records: https://t.co/3J1Sqk532o
RT @kmvnarayan14: NIH's decision to cap research support https://t.co/p7q5pAfv8j via @PeerJPreprints
NIH's decision to cap research support https://t.co/p7q5pAfv8j via @PeerJPreprints
143 days ago
The data and analysis underlying NIH’s decision to cap research support lacked rigor and transparency: a commentary https://t.co/A7Sbt4qOxD
Data and analysis underlying NIH's decision to cap research support lacked rigor and transparency https://t.co/aba8WKx1s7
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

A Cecile JW Janssens wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Gary W Miller reviewed drafts of the paper.

K Venkat Narayan reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The research in this article did not generate any data or code. This is a commentary.

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies