Visitors   Views   Downloads

Composition and predictive functional analysis of bacterial communities in the surface seawater of the Changjiang Estuary

View preprint
Preprint: Composition + predictive functionl analysis of bacteria communities in surface seawater Changjiang Estuary https://t.co/PMd7LlGznX https://t.co/Utwhw1Fnji
158 days ago
PJpreprint: Composition and predictive functional analysis of bacterial communities in the surface seawater of the… https://t.co/rwfu8QwsIz
158 days ago
Composition and predictive functional analysis of bacterial communities in the surface seawater of the Changjiang… https://t.co/H8G8DsbrVa
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Dong-Mei Wu performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables.

Jian-Xin Wang conceived and designed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Xiao-Hui Liu performed the experiments.

Ying-Ping Fan reviewed drafts of the paper.

Ran Jiang performed the experiments.

Ming-Hua Liu performed the experiments.

Shuai-Bing Wang performed the experiments.

Xue-Zhu Liu reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

All the raw sequences in this study have been submitted to the NCBI-SRA public database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/SRP104573) under the ID: SRP104573 (all the twelve samples of the Changjiang Estuary).

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant numbers 31270160, J1310037] and the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, China [grant number LY12C03003]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies