Visitors   Views   Downloads

Taxonomy is not beholden to its dependencies: a rebuttal to Garnett and Christidis (2017)

View preprint
170 days ago
RT @BioInFocus: "Taxonomy is not beholden to its dependencies" is now published in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/FoAL4nyMUY #Taxonomy @marks…
171 days ago
RT @BioInFocus: "Taxonomy is not beholden to its dependencies" is now published in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/FoAL4nyMUY #Taxonomy @marks…
RT @BioInFocus: "Taxonomy is not beholden to its dependencies" is now published in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/FoAL4nyMUY #Taxonomy @marks…
171 days ago
RT @BioInFocus: "Taxonomy is not beholden to its dependencies" is now published in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/FoAL4nyMUY #Taxonomy @marks…
171 days ago
Taxonomy is not beholden to its dependencies: a rebuttal to Garnett and Christidis (2017) https://t.co/S9dWMyuKRn
171 days ago
RT @BioInFocus: "Taxonomy is not beholden to its dependencies" is now published in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/FoAL4nyMUY #Taxonomy @marks…
RT @BioInFocus: "Taxonomy is not beholden to its dependencies" is now published in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/FoAL4nyMUY #Taxonomy @marks…
"Taxonomy is not beholden to its dependencies" is now published in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/FoAL4nyMUY #Taxonomy @markscherz @scott_zona
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Morgan D. Jackson wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Mark D. Scherz wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Scott Zona wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The research in this article did not generate any data or code as it is an opinion piece.

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies