Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Supplementary Figures

Supplementary Figures 1 to 8

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3053v1/supp-1

Supplementary Tables

Supplementary Tables 1 to 4

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3053v1/supp-2

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Simon Roux conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Joanne B Emerson conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Emiley A Eloe-Fadrosh conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Matthew B Sullivan conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The scripts used in this study are available at https://bitbucket.org/MAVERICLab/benchmarking_viromics

The datasets generated for this study are available at http://datacommons.cyverse.org/browse/iplant/home/shared/iVirus/Virome_pipeline_benchmark

Funding

MBS and SR were supported by grants from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (GBMF #3790) and NSF Biological Oceanography (OCE-1536989) awarded to MBS. JBE was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research, under the Genomic Science program (Awards DE-SC0010580 and DE-SC0016440). The work conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, a DOE Office of Science User Facility, is supported under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies